PeoplePulse

Executive People Analytics

Reporting period
Jun 2026 – Nov 2026
Population in Scope
2,659 active employees
Dashboard refreshed
09 Nov 2026

Organization Health

Understand career progression, promotion velocity, workforce movement and organizational health signals.

Promotion Rate
8.2%
6-month period+2.8 pp
Promotion Velocity
27.9 months
Median · avg 28.7 months+6.0 mo
Employees Promoted
211
219 promotion records+84
Critical Role Population
310
11.7% of active workforce
High-Potential Population
478
18.0% of active workforce
Average Tenure
2.4 yrs
Active employees

Promotion Velocity by Career Level

Median and average months at level before promotion, by transition

What the data shows

Median time before promotion ranges from 26.0 months (L5 → L6) to 28.2 months (L4 → L5).

  • L1 → L252 promotions
  • L2 → L381 promotions
  • L3 → L450 promotions
  • L4 → L527 promotions
  • L5 → L69 promotions

Longer time at a level is not inherently negative; it may reflect broader role scope at senior levels.

Promotion Distribution

Unique employees promoted and promotion rate

DepartmentEmployees promotedPromotion rate
Engineering
63
7.6%
Sales
34
8.6%
Product
32
9.5%
Operations
17
9.4%
Customer Success
17
6.2%
Marketing
16
8.8%
Finance
13
8.3%
HR
10
8.5%
IT
9
9.0%

Career Progression

Promotion movements between levels in the period

  1. L1
    52
    L2
  2. L2
    81
    L3
  3. L3
    50
    L4
  4. L4
    27
    L5
  5. L5
    9
    L6

Bar length shows the number of movements between consecutive levels.

Critical Role Coverage

Active employees in roles flagged Critical Role = Yes

Critical role population

310

11.7% of active workforce

Critical role profile
High Potential
16.5%
Exceeds Performance
23.5%
4+ Years Tenure
47 · 15.2%
By department
By job level
By location

Tenure Profile

Share of active employees by tenure band

Velocity by Tenure at Promotion

Median months at level · tenure = promotion date − hire date

Promotion Rate by Performance Band

Observed association, not causation

PerformanceEmployees promotedPromotion rate
Meets
146
8.5%
Exceeds
49
8.2%
Needs Improvement
16
6.3%

Promotion Rate by Potential Band

Observed association, not causation

PotentialEmployees promotedPromotion rate
Medium
110
7.5%
Low
56
8.8%
High
45
9.8%

Organization Health Insights

Promotion velocity varies by career level

Observed

Median time before promotion ranges from 26.0 months (L5 → L6) to 28.2 months (L4 → L5).

Interpretation

Differences may reflect role scope and level design; worth reviewing against intended career architecture.

Where promotions concentrate

Observed

Engineering accounts for 63 of 211 employees promoted (29.9%).

Interpretation

Volume partly tracks department size; compare with the department promotion rate before drawing conclusions.

Progression by performance band

Observed

Employees in the Meets band have the highest observed promotion rate (8.5%), versus 6.3% for Needs Improvement.

Interpretation

An observed association in this dataset only; it does not establish why promotions were granted.

Critical and high-potential population

Observed

Critical roles represent 11.7% of active employees; high-potential employees represent 18.0%.

Interpretation

44.2% of critical-role holders have under two years' tenure — a monitoring signal, not a prediction.

Tenure profile

Observed

In the current dataset, the largest share of active employees sits in the 1–2 yrs band (21.5%); 17.5% have 4+ years' tenure.

Interpretation

Reflects the employee population available in the dataset; compare against hiring history before drawing conclusions.

Additional Workforce Diagnostics

Manager Span of Control

Active direct reports per manager, from the Manager field

Average span
26.6
Median span
26.0
Managers
100

Manager span reflects the reporting-line structure available in the current dataset. Interpret with caution until validated against actual HRIS reporting relationships.

Data notes

  • Tenure analysis is based on the available employee population in the current dataset.
  • Manager span is based on the Manager field and should be validated against actual HRIS reporting relationships.
  • Internal mobility cannot be measured reliably because the current dataset does not contain employee transfer events.